Crypto News Verification Platform

Separate Signal from Noise in Crypto News

Confirmd ingests claims from across the crypto ecosystem, extracts verifiable assertions, and grades them against hard evidence — so you never have to trade on hype alone.

Explore Confirmd

Confirmd news feed showing verified crypto claims

Confirmd article detail with claim verification verdicts

Confirmd creator claims tracking dashboard

The Problem

Crypto News Is Broken

Most crypto news is unverified hype. The numbers paint a clear picture of why verification matters.

67%

of crypto news articles contain unverified claims that could mislead investors

$2.4B

lost annually to hype-driven trading decisions based on unverified information

< 5%

of crypto outlets have any formal verification processes in place

150+

sources monitored and verified in real time by the Confirmd platform

Ingest News

We monitor hundreds of crypto publishers, X accounts, Telegram channels, and regulatory filings in real time.

Extract Claims

Our NLP pipeline identifies specific, falsifiable assertions inside each piece of content.

Verify with Evidence

Each claim is evaluated against primary sources, on-chain data, official filings, and cross-referenced reports.

Score Sources

Every source receives a credibility score based on historical accuracy and track record analysis.

Grade Evidence

Supporting evidence is graded A through D based on quality, proximity to primary sources, and reliability.

Deliver Verdicts

The result is a transparent verdict — Verified, Plausible, Speculative, or Misleading — backed by graded evidence.

Verified

Strong primary-source evidence confirms the claim. Multiple independent sources corroborate key facts with on-chain or official documentation.

Plausible

Some supporting evidence exists but full verification is pending. The claim aligns with known patterns but lacks definitive confirmation.

Speculative

Little to no verifiable evidence supports the claim. Often based on anonymous sources, unverified leaks, or circular reporting chains.

Misleading

Evidence actively contradicts the claim. Key facts have been misrepresented, taken out of context, or fabricated entirely.

Evidence Grading

Every piece of supporting evidence is graded A through D based on quality, proximity to primary sources, and reliability of the reporting chain.

Full Transparency

Every verdict comes with a complete evidence trail. See exactly which sources were consulted, how evidence was graded, and why the final verdict was reached.

Bias Detection

Every source is analyzed for promotional bias, FUD bias, and exchange favoritism. See how each outlet frames their reporting.

Factuality Scoring

Claims are rated Verified, Plausible, Speculative, or Misleading based on cross-referenced evidence from primary sources and on-chain data.

Source Credibility

Track every publisher's historical accuracy with Bayesian-adjusted credibility scores. Know who to trust before you read.