The Jackson Liquidity Framework

A new standard for liquidity in AMM-Based Financial Systems

The first comprehensive, regulator-aligned methodology for sizing and managing liquidity in automated market makers used for CBDCs, tokenised assets, and next-generation settlement networks. Built to solve the critical question the industry has overlooked:

How much liquidity does an AMM-based financial system actually need?
Explore

Understand the Breakthrough Behind
The Jackson Liquidity Framework

A clear and accessible explanation of the liquidity dynamics, mathematical models, and findings inside the whitepaper — designed for everyone from crypto beginners to central bank researchers.
The Jackson Liquidity Framework was created to answer the biggest unanswered question in tokenised finance and CBDC settlement:

How much liquidity does an AMM-based financial system actually require?

The Problem No One Had Solved

Why AMM Liquidity Is a Missing Piece in Modern Banking

The future of money is moving toward:
- Tokenised assets
- CBDCs
- Instant cross-border settlement
- Automated FX conversion
- Pre-funded liquidity pools


But unlike traditional RTGS systems, AMMs introduce non-linear liquidity requirements that change with flow patterns, volatility, and directional imbalance.

Yet — until now — no regulator, bank, or academic body has produced a formal liquidity sizing framework for AMM settlement.

The Jackson Liquidity Framework fills this gap.

The Core Dynamics Behind AMM Liquidity

1. Slippage (The “Shallow Pond” Effect)

- When liquidity is shallow, even small trades cause large price impact.
- When liquidity is deep, impact is minimal.
- This makes AMM liquidity non-linear and dangerous when reserves are low.
2. Directional Flow Imbalance (The “Seesaw” Effect)

Real payment corridors rarely balance perfectly.
If more flow moves in one direction, AMM reserves drain — quickly.
3. Intraday Clustering (The “Storm” Effect)

Payments don’t arrive evenly. They arrive in clusters, especially around cut-off times or liquidity cycles.
Clustering can multiply liquidity demand by 2–4×.

Introducing the Four Jackson Components

JLR — Jackson Liquidity Requirement

Defines the minimum reserve depth required for safe AMM settlement.

Combines four factors:
- Slippage
- Directional flow VaR
- Intraday liquidity peaks
- Basel III constraints
JSI — Jackson Stability Invariant

A solvency-style boundary showing when a pool becomes unstable.
If reserves fall below this curve, the AMM becomes fragile.
JLS — Jackson Liquidity Surface

A 3D map showing how liquidity demand rises with:
- Arrival rate
- Payment size volatility
- Corridor conditions
J-Score - Jackson Corridor Stress Metric

A single number that expresses settlement stress — instantly.
Used for monitoring and real-time decision-making.

Fragmentation: The Hidden Liquidity Killer

Splitting liquidity across multiple pools dramatically increases the total amount needed — sometimes by 900%.

A single unified pool is always more efficient than many shallow ones.

What This Means for CBDCs, FMIs, and Banks

The Jackson Liquidity Framework brings mathematical clarity to a problem regulators have acknowledged but not defined.

By integrating slippage constraints, stochastic flow models, and intraday liquidity peaks, the framework creates a liquidity model suitable for real-world CBDC settlement networks.

Try the Tools That Power the Research

See the framework come alive through my interactive simulator.

Experiment with:
- Poisson vs Hawkes flows
- Real-time slippage curves
- Reserve depletion paths
- J-score monitoring
- Fragmentation penalty modelling
- The full JLS Surface

Glossary

AMM Liquidity

Liquidity inside an Automated Market Maker (AMM) refers to the amount of capital held in its reserves.
In AMM-based settlement systems, liquidity determines:

- how much value the pool can process
- how sensitive prices are to incoming trades (slippage), and
- whether the system remains stable under stress.

Unlike traditional markets, AMM liquidity requirements grow non-linearly, meaning small reductions in reserves can cause large increases in slippage or system instability.

--

Directional Flow Imbalance

Directional Flow Imbalance measures how much more payment volume is moving in one direction than the other within a corridor.

If significantly more payments flow from A → B than B → A, the AMM becomes unbalanced, draining one reserve while overfilling the other.

This imbalance is one of the primary drivers of reserve depletion in AMM settlement systems and directly influences liquidity requirements and risk levels.

--

Hawkes Process

A Hawkes Process is a statistical model that describes self-exciting events — meaning one event increases the likelihood of another event occurring shortly afterwards.

In payment systems, this models real-world behaviour where transactions cluster in bursts, especially around deadlines or liquidity cycles.

Hawkes-driven flows create intraday liquidity spikes that dramatically increase AMM stress and liquidity demand.

--

Poisson Arrivals

Poisson arrivals represent random, independent events occurring at a constant average rate.

In AMM settlement modelling, Poisson flows describe calm, steady-state corridor behaviour without clustering.

Poisson is useful for baseline analysis but tends to underestimate real-world liquidity risk compared to Hawkes clustering.
--

Slippage Tolerance (ε)

Slippage tolerance is the maximum acceptable deviation between the expected price and actual execution price of a trade inside an AMM.

Lower tolerance values (tight ε) require deeper liquidity, because even small trades must cause minimal price movement.

In the Jackson Liquidity Framework, slippage tolerance directly affects the minimum liquidity requirement (JLR).

--

Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)

Part of the Basel III regulatory framework, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio requires banks to maintain enough High-Quality Liquid Assets to survive 30 days of stress outflows.

In AMM-based settlement, reserves locked inside AMM pools may affect LCR calculations because prefunded liquidity is encumbered and cannot be freely used elsewhere.

Understanding how AMM reserves interact with LCR is essential for regulatory compliance.

--

PFMI Principle 7

Principle 7 of the CPMI-IOSCO Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures requires FMIs to maintain sufficient liquid resources to withstand extreme but plausible market conditions.

The Jackson Liquidity Framework maps AMM liquidity requirements directly to this principle, offering a quantitative method to validate whether AMM-based corridors meet PFMI standards.

--

Pre-Funded Liquidity

Pre-funded liquidity refers to capital that must be deposited into settlement pools or corridors before transactions occur.

In AMM-based CBDC and FX systems (e.g., BIS Project Mariana), this prefunding ensures instant settlement but introduces a new question:
How much liquidity must the system hold at all times to operate safely?

The JLF provides the first quantitative answer to that question.

--

JLR — Jackson Liquidity Requirement

JLR defines the minimum reserve depth needed for safe AMM operation under slippage constraints, flow imbalance, intraday liquidity stress, and Basel III encumbrance rules.

It combines multiple risk measures into a single liquidity benchmark.

--

JSI — Jackson Stability Invariant

JSI is a solvency-style condition that determines whether an AMM reserve configuration is in the stable or unstable region.

It relates liquidity depth to volatility and flow dynamics, marking a critical threshold for corridor viability.

--

JLS — Jackson Liquidity Surface

JLS is a 3D map showing how liquidity requirements scale as arrival rates, payment volatility, and flow conditions change.

It reveals the nonlinear nature of AMM liquidity demand — small increases in volatility or flow can lead to massive increases in required liquidity.

--

J-Score — Jackson Corridor Stress Metric

The J-score is a single, real-time metric summarising the stress level of an AMM corridor.

High J-scores indicate elevated risk due to:high arrival rates,large payment sizes,strong directional skew, orclustering events.

It allows FMIs and banks to monitor corridor health just like a stress gauge.

Try the Tools That Power the Research

See the framework come alive through my interactive simulator.

Experiment with:
- Poisson vs Hawkes flows
- Real-time slippage curves
- Reserve depletion paths
- J-score monitoring
- Fragmentation penalty modelling
- The full JLS Surface
Read Technical Whitepaper
Read Simple Whitepaper
Go To Simulation Hub